Effect of characteristics of women on attendance in blind and non-blind randomised trials: analysis of recruitment data from the EPHT Trial

نویسندگان

  • Piret Veerus
  • Krista Fischer
  • Elina Hemminki
  • Sirpa-Liisa Hovi
  • Matti Hakama
چکیده

OBJECTIVES To analyse the effect of women's characteristics on their willingness to join a blind or a non-blind subtrial or to be excluded by physicians. DESIGN Primary prevention trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). A 2×2, randomised design with a non-blind HT arm or control arm and a blind HT arm or placebo arm. SETTING 3 clinical centres in Estonia. METHODS Interest in joining the trial was asked in a questionnaire together with demographic and health status data. Interested and eligible women were invited to a health examination that also informed whether they belonged to a blind or to a non-blind subtrial; the arm was not revealed. Trial physicians made further exclusions when checking the women's eligibility. Thereafter, informed consent was asked as detailed in the flow chart. Comparisons were made between non-blind and blind subtrials. Analyses were carried out for each of the background variables. OUTCOME MEASURES The proportion of willingness, eligibility and attendance. RESULTS Women randomised to the non-blind subtrial were more willing to join (relative risk (RR) 1.17) and more likely to be found eligible by physicians (RR 1.10) than women in the blind subtrial, resulting in larger attendance (RR 1.29). Women with higher education were differentially more willing to join the non-blind trial (RR 1.29) than those with basic education (RR 1.08); the differential willingness of never-smokers (RR 1.20) was larger than that of current smokers (RR 1.07). The differential exclusion by physicians by education and smoking were small. Some subjective symptoms (eg, diarrhoea/constipation, stomach pain) had reverse differential effects on attendance in the non-blind subtrial in comparison to the blind subtrial. Menopausal symptoms did not affect the differential interest, eligibility or attendance. CONCLUSIONS Blinding in RCT reduces attendance, due to decisions of the women and the trial physicians. Differential attendance by blinding may affect the generalisability of the results from trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN35338757.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Results from a blind and a non-blind randomised trial run in parallel: experience from the Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy (EPHT) Trial

BACKGROUND The Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy (EPHT) Trial assigned 4170 potential participants prior to recruitment to blind or non-blind hormone therapy (HT), with placebo or non-treatment the respective alternatives. Before having to decide on participation, women were told whether they had been randomised to the blind or non-blind trial. Eligible women who were still willing to joi...

متن کامل

تحلیل کارآزمایی های بالینی متقاطع با در نظر گرفتن وضعیت تمکین بیماران بعنوان یک متغیر دو حالتی

  Background and Objective: A one of the most power on assesses treatment effect is doubled-blind clinical trial. Therefore, deviation of protocol would impede the results in clinical trial. In practice (especially in studies which intervention is drug medication) is non-compliance. Researchers use intention-to-treat analysis for estimation of treatment effects in clinical trials with non-compl...

متن کامل

Effect of Statin Treatment on COVID-19 Patients’ Outcomes: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Statins may be protective against viral infection and have been suggested for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).  Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on COVID-19 patients. Methods: Our study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial that constitutes a population of COVID-19 patients admitted to Bu-Ali Sina Hospi...

متن کامل

Blindness in Randomized Controlled Trials

In combination with randomization, blinding or masking is an important factor in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), particularly in trials that assess therapeutic effects. Here an attempt is made to explain blindness and why it is important. In clinical trials, blinding is defined as the condition imposed on a study in which study participants, health care providers and assessors collecting o...

متن کامل

Effect of Intralipid Infusion on Pregnancy Outcome in Infertile Women with History of Implantation Failure: A Single Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

 Background and purpose: Recurrent implantation failure is one of the problems associated with in vitro fertilization cycles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of pregnancy using intralipid infusion in infertile women with history of two implantation failures. Materials and methods: A clinical trial was conducted in 80 infertile women in the infertility center in Sari Imam Khom...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016